Analisis visual attention peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal fluida dinamis menggunakan gaze plot-eye tracking
Abstract
This study aims to analyze and explore students' visual attention when working on dynamic fluid problems. Learners' visual attention is analyze and explore based on different cognitive levels of learners. There are three cognitive levels analyzed, namely high, medium, and low cognitive levels. The research method used in this research is explorative. The research sample amounted to 6 students from one of the private high schools in Bandung City from class XII Bilingual and XII MIPA. There are 2 students from each cognitive level. Data analysis was conducted using paired t-test analysis, gaze-plot, and interview transcripts. Each learner has a different eye-movement and information processing process that leads to a very diverse gaze-plot. In general, students pay more attention to relevant factors compared to irrelevant factors contained in the questions given.
Downloads
References
Arikunto. (2010). Psychol 3. In Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. (Vol. 34, Issue 2010).
Beesley, T., Pearson, D., & Le Pelley, M. (2019). Eye tracking as a tool for examining cognitive processes. In Biophysical measurement in experimental social science research (pp. 1-30). Academic Press.
Carter, B. T., & Luke, S. G. (2020). Jo ur na l P of. International Journal of Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.05.010
Cullipher, S., Hansen, S. J., & VandenPlas, J. R. (2018). Eye tracking as a research tool: An introduction. In Eye tracking for the chemistry education researcher (pp. 1-9). American Chemical Society.
EFETÜRK, Ö. A., TURGUT, G., DERESHGİ, H. A., & YILMAZ, A. (2022). A review of visual attention research using eye-tracking technologies. Journal of Smart Systems Research, 3(2), 128-135.
Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational leadership, 43(2), 44-48.
Goodwin, S., Prouzeau, A., Whitelock-jones, R., Hurter, C., Lawrence, L., Afzal, U., & Dwyer, T. (2022). Visual Informatics VETA : Visual eye-tracking analytics for the exploration of gaze patterns and behaviours. Visual Informatics, 6(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2022.02.004
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613
Jones, V. O. (2006). Cognitive Processes during Problem Solving of Middle School Students with Different Levels of Mathematics Anxiety and Self Esteem: Case Studies.
Kekule, M. (2014). Students ’ approaches when dealing with kinematics graphs explored by eye-tracking research method. May.
Kemendikbud. (2016). Salinan Permendikbud Nomor 23 tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. 2016, Standar Penilaian Pendidikan, 1–12. http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1669%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201
Khachatryan, H., & Rihn, A. L. (2014). Eye-tracking methodology and applications in consumer research. Electron Data Inf Source UF/IFAS Ext, 1-5.
Montolalu, C., & Langi, Y. (2018). Pengaruh Pelatihan Dasar Komputer dan Teknologi Informasi bagi Guru-Guru dengan Uji-T Berpasangan (Paired Sample T-Test). D’CARTESIAN, 7(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.35799/dc.7.1.2018.20113
Mulyo, M. R. G. T., Sari, A. F., & Syarifuddin, A. (2019). Proses Berpikir Siswa Bergaya Kognitif Visualizer dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah TIMSS Non Geometri. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i1.435
Nisiforou, E. A., & Laghos, A. (2013). Do the eyes have it? Using eye tracking to assess students cognitive dimensions. Educational Media International, 50(4), 247-265.
Nurachmandani, S. (2009). Fisika 1 Untuk SMA/MA Kelas X. Jakarta: Grahadi.
Panjaitan, B. (2013). Proses Kognitif Siswa Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 19(1), 17–25. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jip/article/view/3751
PISA. (2018). Indonesia What 15-year-old students in Indonesia know and can do Figure 1 . Snapshot of performance in reading , mathematics and science. 1–10.
Rayner, K. (2009). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Eye movements and attention in reading , scene perception , and visual search The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture Eye movements and attention in reading , scene perception , and visual search (Issue April 2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
Salsabila, N. H. (2017). Proses Kognitif dalam Pembelajaran Bermakna. Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya II, Knpmp Ii, 434–443.
Slamet, S., & Maarif, S. (2014). Pengaruh Bentuk Tes Formatif Assosiasi Pilihan Ganda Dengan Reward Dan Punishment Score Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa Sma. Infinity Journal, 3(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v3i1.39
Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Pearson. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=iKUatAEACAAJ
Tsai, M., Hou, H., Lai, M., Liu, W., & Yang, F. (2011). Author ’ s personal copy Computers & Education Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem : An eye-tracking analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.012
Wilkerson, S., & Wilkerson, S. D. (2008). Application of the Paired t-test. Undergraduate Research Journal. Scholarly Note, 5(1), 4–5.
