Karakterisasi tes keterampilan berpikir kritis dalam aspek evaluation berdasarkan graded response models
Abstract
Information, knowledge, and technology are currently developing very rapidly as the world has entered the 21st century. Therefore, the role of educational institutions is very important to prepare students to have skills that support this century, one of which is critical thinking skills. Students' critical thinking skills can be identified through measuring instruments that can stimulate students to think critically. However, in reality, educators rarely develop measuring instruments that can identify critical thinking skills because it takes a long time and is difficult to construct and analyze these measuring instruments. This study aims to determine the characteristics of critical thinking skills tests in the aspect of evaluation based on Graded Response Models. This type of research is a quantitative descriptive research. The research population taken was all students of class XI SMA Negeri in Cianjur Regency with a sample of 132 students from three different schools. The sample was determined by using purposive sampling combined with convenience sampling. Research data was taken through a critical thinking skills test in the form of a four-tier diagnostic test instrument with 20 items oriented to aspects of critical thinking skills according to Facione (2020), namely interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation. The main focus in this research is the 3 items developed based on the evaluation aspect. Data analysis carried out in this study was based on item response theory with Graded Response Models assisted by the eirt 2.0.3 software. The results of the test characteristic curve analysis show that the critical thinking skills test on the evaluation aspect obtains a discriminating power in the range of 0.60 to 1.11 which is included in the good category. Meanwhile, the difficulty index (bjk) is in the range of -0.99 to 5.06 with a different difficulty index for each category. The information peak of the information function curve for each item in the evaluation aspect lies in the range of 0.69 to 1.71. This shows that this test can measure students' critical thinking skills in the evaluation aspect from moderate to high abilities.
Downloads
References
Ennis, R.H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Disposition and Abilities. [Online].
Facione, P.A. (2020). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. California: The California Academic Press.
Farcis, F. (2019). Profil Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Palangka Raya Dalam Proses Analisis Artikel Ilmiah. Jurnal Jejaring Matematika dan Sains, 1(1), 52-58.
Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamental of Item Response Theory. London: New Dehli
Kartimi, K., & Liliasari, L. (2012). Pengembangan alat ukur berpikir kritis pada konsep termokimia untuk siswa sma peringkat atas dan menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(1), 122852.
Ni'mah, Z., Fariyani, Q., & Sudarmanto, A. (2021). Four-Tier Multiple Choice Test Characterized by Local Wisdom Values for Analyzing Critical Thinking Skills. Thabiea: Journal Of Natural Science Teaching, 4(1), 97-110.
Permata, A. R., Muslim, M., & Suyana, I. (2019, December). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada materi momentum dan impuls. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal) (Vol. 8, pp. SNF2019-PE).
Shaw, A., Liu, O. L., Gu, L., Kardonova, E., Chirikov, I., Li, G., ... Chirikov, I. (2019). Thinking Critically About Critical Thinking: Validating the Russian Heighten ® Critical Thinking Assessment. Studies in Higher Education.
Wahyudi. (2016). Penskoran Politomi Dalam Teori Respon Butir Menggunakan Graded Response Model (GRM). http://repository.unhas.ac.id/handle/1234 56789/20429. Di akses 3 Agustus 2018.
Wulandari, L. A., & Redhana, I. W. (2021). Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Case Study-Based Learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 020037(2330)