Leadership-Driven University Labor Education Reform via PDCA Cycle

Authors

Keywords:

University labor education, PDCA cycle, Leadership, Educational governance, Collaborative mechanism

Abstract

Under the “five-education development” strategy, the reform of labor education in universities is crucial to the quality of talent cultivation, yet it often falls into difficulties due to insufficient driving force, poor coordination among main stakeholders, lack of process management, and unclear effectiveness evaluation. The core issue lies in the inadequate alignment between school leadership and systematic promotion mechanisms. The closed-loop management logic of the PDCA. cycle provides a methodology for this, but its effective operation urgently requires leadership empowerment throughout the process. This study uses a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methods, to construct an integrated analytical framework of “Leadership-PDCA”. Research has found that the effective advancement of reforms depends on a four-dimensional leadership system encompassing “vision guidance-coordinated planning-process control-reflective iteration”, and it needs to dynamically align with each stage of the PDCA cycle: the planning stage relies on transformational leadership to create a blueprint, the execution stage requires distributed leadership to promote collaboration, the checking stage guides reflection through instructional leadership, and the action stage depends on strategic leadership to drive institutionalization. Research conclusions indicate that combining systematic process control with flexible interpersonal influence to form a “dual-drive” strategy is key to overcoming collaboration barriers, preventing process derailment, and advancing labor education reform from “fragmented” to a “systematic” depth. This study provides a theoretical reference and practical approach for optimizing governance in higher education.

References

Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, & State Council. (2020). Opinions on comprehensively strengthening labor education in primary, secondary, and higher education in the new era.

Binnewies, C., & Gromer, M. (2012). Leader support and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), 441–452.

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.

Chen, B. (2021). Thoroughly implementing the "five educations" simultaneously to comprehensively improve education quality. Chinese Journal of Education, (1), 1–5.

Chen, X., Yang, G., & Wang, Y. (2023). The impact of deans' distributed leadership on university teachers' job performance: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Studies in Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.226789

Deming, W. E. (2019). Turning crisis into safety (H. Zhong & Y. Dai, Trans.). China Light Industry Press. (Original work published 1982)*

Li, L. (2022). The value connotations and practical paths of labor education in universities. Educational Research, 43(3), 102–110.

Liu, Y. (2025). Implementation path of "home-school-community" tripartite collaborative labor education in vocational colleges based on the PDCA model. Vocational Education Research, (10), 67–71.

Wang, D. (2023). Deep integration of "labor and innovation" in universities under the background of a strong education nation: Value symbiosis, model exploration, and path guidance. Beijing Education (Higher Education), (10), 39–42.

Zainal, Z., & Mohd Matore, M. R. (2021). Leadership style and teaching innovation: A systematic review. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43(2), 156–172.

Zhang, X., & Cao, R. (2025). Implementation difficulties and solutions of labor education in universities: A survey based on 20 general undergraduate colleges in Henan Province. Journal of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry (Social Science Edition), 26(6), 55–61, 77.

BelliBaş, E., Kılınç, S., & Polat Can, S. (2021). Transformational leadership as a driver of educational reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(3), 345–362.

Published

2026-05-25

Issue

Section

Articles