Virtual Laboratory Logistik Berbasis Metaverse Virtual Reality Untuk Logistik Indonesia Yang Unggul
Keywords:
logistik, metaverse virtual reality, pendidikan, pendidikan vokasi, simulasi logistikAbstract
Penelitian ini mengusulkan pengembangan Virtual Laboratory Logistics (ViraLL) berbasis Metaverse Virtual Reality sebagai solusi inovatif untuk mengatasi kesenjangan antara kompetensi lulusan institusi pendidikan dengan kebutuhan industri logistik di Indonesia. Latar belakang penelitian ini adalah menurunnya Logistics Performance Index (LPI) Indonesia dan perlunya peningkatan kualitas sumber daya manusia di bidang logistik. Metode yang digunakan adalah pengembangan sistem pembelajaran interaktif dengan menggunakan teknologi metaverse virtual reality yang mensimulasikan kondisi nyata industri logistik. ViraLL dirancang dengan tiga fitur utama: Levelling, Logistivitas, dan Interaksi Sosial. Hasil yang diharapkan adalah peningkatan pemahaman dan kemampuan praktis siswa dan mahasiswa logistik, serta pengurangan kesenjangan antara dunia pendidikan dan industri. Implementasi ViraLL diproyeksikan dapat mendukung peningkatan kompetensi sumber daya manusia logistik Indoneia, yang pada akhirnya akan mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi nasional. Penelitian ini juga mengeksplorasi potensi realisasi ide, respon masyarakat, perolehan hak cipta, pengembangan PKM-KC, serta dampaknya terhadap aspek pendidikan dan keterlibatan pihak berwenang.
Downloads
References
Achmad, S. R. (2013). Sumber daya manusia berkualitas mengubah visi menjadi realitas. PT Gramedia Pustaka Umum.
Alimudin, I. A., Permana, P., & Sriyono. (2018). Studi kesiapan kerja peserta didik SMK untuk bekerja di industri perbaikan bodi otomotif. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 5(2), 191–197.
Allcoat, D., & von Mühlenen, A. (2018). Learning in virtual reality: Effects on performance, emotion and engagement. Research in Learning Technology, 26. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2140
Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133–149.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Tingkat pengangguran terbuka berdasarkan tingkat pendidikan, 2021–2022. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MTE3OSMy/tingkat-pengangguran-terbuka-berdasarkan-tingkat-pendidikan.html
Baker, D., Briant, S., Hajirasouli, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Paz, A., Bhaskar, A., Corry, P., Whelan, K., Donehue, P., & Parsons, H. (2023). Urban freight logistics and land use planning education: Trends and gaps through the lens of literature. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100731
Cano, J., Salazar, F., Gómez-Montoya, R., & Cortés, P. (2021). Disruptive and conventional technologies for the support of logistics processes: A literature review. International Journal of Technology, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v12i3.4280
Chen, F., Leng, Y., Ge, J., Wang, D., Li, C., Chen, B., & Sun, Z. (2020). Effectiveness of virtual reality in nursing education: Meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9). https://doi.org/10.2196/18290
Cherniavskyi, V., Voloshynov, S., Volska, O., Panchenko, N., Vasiļjevs, A., & Bezverkhnuik, T. (2019). Developing teachers’ digital competence in transport and logistics through blended learning tools. ICTE in Transportation and Logistics 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39688-6_39
Dewi, A. R. (2013). Pengaruh konservatisme laporan keuangan terhadap earnings response coefficient. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VI, 119–159.
Fajarini, P. (2023). Logistics performance index (LPI), komponen, dan metode pengukurannya. https://supplychainindonesia.com/logistics-performances-index-lpi-komponen-dan-metode-pengukurannya/
Fowler, C. (2015). Virtual reality and learning: Where is the pedagogy? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 412–422.
Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education. eLearning & Software for Education, 1, 133–141.
Futri, N., Dewi, K., & Rahman, S. (2023). Analisis perkembangan kondisi perekonomian Sulawesi Barat dalam menghadapi tantangan global tahun 2022. Jurnal Manarang Manajemen, 2(1), 112–120.
Howard, M. C., Gutworth, M. B., & Jacobs, R. R. (2021). A meta-analysis of virtual reality training programs. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106808
Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2018). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1515–1529.
Ka, J., Kim, H., Kim, J., & Kim, W. (2025). Analysis of virtual reality teaching methods in engineering education. Virtual Reality, 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-024-01081-1
Kaplan, A. D., Cruit, J., Endsley, M., Beers, S. M., Sawyer, B. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2021). The effects of immersive virtual reality on learning outcomes. Human Factors, 63(6), 1022–1042.
Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. (2023). Capai pertumbuhan ekonomi berkualitas, Menko Airlangga tegaskan logistik menjadi key driver utama. https://www.ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/5380/capai-pertumbuhan-ekonomi-berkualitas-menko-airlangga-tegaskan-logistik-menjadi-key-driver-utama
Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. (2024, February 29). Pemerintah optimis Indonesia tumbuh solid di 2024 dan lebih baik lagi di 2025. https://www.ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/5653/pemerintah-optimis-indonesia-tumbuh-solid-di-2024-dan-lebih-baik-lagi-di-2025
Kyaw, B. M., Saxena, N., Posadzki, P., et al. (2019). Virtual reality for health professions education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/12959
Makransky, G., Borre-Gude, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Motivational and cognitive benefits of immersive virtual reality. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(5), 691–707.
Marion, A., Pereira, L., & Pinho, D. (2023). The effect of interprofessional simulation practice on collaborative learning. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 39(1), 14–21.
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40.
Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785–797.
Permendikbud Nomor 34 Tahun 2018 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK)/Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan (MAK).
Pickering, M., Jopp, R., Wheeler, M., & Topple, C. (2024). Authentic learning and job readiness: Are mixed-reality simulations effective tools? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9296
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.
Saefudin, E. A., & Sumardi, K. (2018). Learning media for vocational education. Proceedings of the 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training, 165–167.
Villena-Taranilla, R., Tirado-Olivares, S., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & González-Calero, J. (2022). Effects of virtual reality on learning outcomes in K–6 education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 36, 100434.
Wu, B., Yu, X., & Gu, X. (2020). Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality using head-mounted displays. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 1991–2005.
World Bank. (2023). Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1 = low to 5 = high). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/LP.LPI.LOGS.XQ
World Bank. (2023). The logistics performance index and its indicators. World Bank.
